Skip to main content
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Source Link

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted:

3 down3 down

Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 repcosts you 1 rep, unless the downvoted post is later deleted.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted:

3 down

Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep, unless the downvoted post is later deleted.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted:

3 down

Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep, unless the downvoted post is later deleted.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

added 160 characters in body
Source Link
Shog9
  • 101
  • 7
  • 26

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted.:

3 down

Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep, unless the downvoted post is later deleted.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted. Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted:

3 down

Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep, unless the downvoted post is later deleted.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

added the reason which added to my confusion
Source Link
Aditya
  • 13.5k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 19

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted. Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted. Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep.

All or most anyway, not sure about the chefs etc., SE staff have special mod status. Presumably, this is part of the special way that they are handled.

Basically, that's not a regular user but a Stack Exchange employee so different rules apply.

As for the cases where they have <100 rep and have not posted, they have probably downvoted. Each downvote on an answer costs you 1 rep.

Moreover, the negative reputation is not visible in reputation history of users to anybody but the user himself/herself.

added 199 characters in body
Source Link
terdon
  • 102.8k
  • 2
  • 74
  • 136
Loading
Source Link
terdon
  • 102.8k
  • 2
  • 74
  • 136
Loading