Skip to main content
added 1061 characters in body
Source Link
rusty
  • 16.7k
  • 11
  • 8

The second one (personal openion)! That seems a bit darker but more close to the Ubuntu orange (as specified in Ubuntu's Brand Assets). While the other one is far from this (but seems that's what recommended by Jono Bacon, Ubuntu Community Manager, in his website as linked by Oli in his post) and looks somewhat a blend of the community-feel Ubuntu Orange and commercial-indicating Canonical Aubergine, and may be that's the intention - cover both community and commercial software packages with that shade ?!

1: Ubuntu Orange - Canonical Aubergine blend:

snap1

2: The colour palette:

snap2 http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-colour-tints.png

(source: pic 2)

Button1 pic1 http://hostmar.co/software-banner

Button2 pic2

Some guidelines for correct use of Ubuntu logo; you must not…

Change the spacing between the individual elements or characters

Change the colour of the wordmark

Change the colour of the Circle of Friends

Change the arrangement of the elements

Place the logo at an angle other than horizontal or vertical

Change the proportion of the logo

Place the logo on a non brand colour

Some easily noticed features in the compared buttons:

  • Ubuntu Orange? Or Orange? [Button1 - ???; Button2 + orange blends]

  • Colour of Circle of Friends? [Button1 - ???; Button2 + white]

  • Roundel? It's colour? [Button1 + white; Button2 - ???]

  • Looks good? [Button1 + Y; Button2 - ?]

Something probably needs an update..

The second one (personal openion)! That seems a bit darker but more close to the Ubuntu orange (as specified in Ubuntu's Brand Assets). While the other one is far from this (but seems that's what recommended by Jono Bacon, Ubuntu Community Manager, in his website as linked by Oli in his post) and looks somewhat a blend of the community-feel Ubuntu Orange and commercial-indicating Canonical Aubergine, and may be that's the intention - cover both community and commercial software packages with that shade!

1: Ubuntu Orange - Canonical Aubergine blend:

snap1

2: The colour palette:

snap2 http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-colour-tints.png

(source: pic 2)

The second one (personal openion)! That seems a bit darker but more close to the Ubuntu orange (as specified in Ubuntu's Brand Assets). While the other one is far from this (but seems that's what recommended by Jono Bacon, Ubuntu Community Manager, in his website as linked by Oli in his post) and looks somewhat a blend of the community-feel Ubuntu Orange and commercial-indicating Canonical Aubergine, and may be that's the intention - cover both community and commercial software packages with that shade ?!

1: Ubuntu Orange - Canonical Aubergine blend:

snap1

2: The colour palette:

snap2 http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-colour-tints.png

(source: pic 2)

Button1 pic1 http://hostmar.co/software-banner

Button2 pic2

Some guidelines for correct use of Ubuntu logo; you must not…

Change the spacing between the individual elements or characters

Change the colour of the wordmark

Change the colour of the Circle of Friends

Change the arrangement of the elements

Place the logo at an angle other than horizontal or vertical

Change the proportion of the logo

Place the logo on a non brand colour

Some easily noticed features in the compared buttons:

  • Ubuntu Orange? Or Orange? [Button1 - ???; Button2 + orange blends]

  • Colour of Circle of Friends? [Button1 - ???; Button2 + white]

  • Roundel? It's colour? [Button1 + white; Button2 - ???]

  • Looks good? [Button1 + Y; Button2 - ?]

Something probably needs an update..

added 568 characters in body
Source Link
rusty
  • 16.7k
  • 11
  • 8

The second one (personal openion)! That seems a bit darker but more close to the Ubuntu orange (as specified in Ubuntu's Brand Assets). While the other one is far from this. (I personally like the lower tintsbut seems that's what recommended by Jono Bacon, Ubuntu Community Manager, in his website as linked by Oli in his post) and looks somewhat a blend of the orangecommunity-feel Ubuntu Orange and commercial-indicating Canonical Aubergine, and wish they shippedmay be that's the ubuntu-monointention -* directory icons cover both community and commercial software packages with those between 60that shade!

1: Ubuntu Orange -80%.) Canonical Aubergine blend:

snap1

2: The colour palette:

snap2 http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-colour-tints.png

(source: pic 2)

The second one! That seems a bit darker but more close to the Ubuntu orange. While the other one is far from this. (I personally like the lower tints of the orange, and wish they shipped the ubuntu-mono-* directory icons with those between 60-80%.)

snap2 http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-colour-tints.png

The second one (personal openion)! That seems a bit darker but more close to the Ubuntu orange (as specified in Ubuntu's Brand Assets). While the other one is far from this (but seems that's what recommended by Jono Bacon, Ubuntu Community Manager, in his website as linked by Oli in his post) and looks somewhat a blend of the community-feel Ubuntu Orange and commercial-indicating Canonical Aubergine, and may be that's the intention - cover both community and commercial software packages with that shade!

1: Ubuntu Orange - Canonical Aubergine blend:

snap1

2: The colour palette:

snap2 http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-colour-tints.png

(source: pic 2)

Source Link
rusty
  • 16.7k
  • 11
  • 8

The second one! That seems a bit darker but more close to the Ubuntu orange. While the other one is far from this. (I personally like the lower tints of the orange, and wish they shipped the ubuntu-mono-* directory icons with those between 60-80%.)

snap2 http://design.ubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu-colour-tints.png