Timeline for Using abbreviations and a `threatsome` advice from a community member [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2013 at 5:59 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Nov 19, 2013 at 4:09 | |||||
| Nov 18, 2013 at 5:51 | comment | added | Mateo | Using "real" names is not advertising, it is using language properly so people know what you are talking about, referring to a software with censored or derogatory terms is extremely hurtful to the community. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 5:43 | history | edited | Mateo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected abveriations
|
| Nov 17, 2013 at 22:03 | history | closed |
Braiam RolandiXorMod |
Duplicate of A critical note (alternative title: where is my speech freedom?) | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 19:09 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | Also, I don't see a "threat" anywhere, what is this "threatsome" advice you speak of? When there's rollback wars moderators typically get involved, I was only stating a fact not making a threat. | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 19:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 17, 2013 at 22:04 | |||||
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:59 | history | edited | Thomas WardMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:58 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | Thanks for pointing that out to them, Braiam. Yes, I am not a moderator, the little diamonds next to people's names means they're moderators. I'm just an incredibly enthusiastic, sometimes borderline-annoying community member. I am not a moderator. Oli, however, is a moderator, and the answer I wrote here on this question is a direct quote from him. Just follow the attribution link I mentioned in the post and you'll see Oli is in fact a moderator and I'm just quoting what moderators say. | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:57 | comment | added | Braiam | BTW, @ThomasW. is not a Moderator.... | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:41 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | The Ubuntu Software and this site are not related to each other. This site may indeed actually help be a community support location for the Ubuntu site, but it is NOT run by the Ubuntu Community Council and is a separate entity. It does NOT have unrestricted freedom, nor do the other Ubuntu support mediums (IRC, mailing lists, forums, etc.) which all have their own restrictions and policies. There is ZERO expectation of freedom of speech on ANY of those sites. You are confusing the mission statement of the Ubuntu OS with the mission statements of the support mediums. | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:39 | answer | added | Thomas WardMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:37 | history | migrated | from askubuntu.com (revisions) | ||
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:35 | comment | added | Web-E | Free doesn't mean you can break rules & regulations of anything that has a ubuntu in it. Why do you think spelling Microsoft is against free spirit? Microsoft do contribute to open source. leave that aside, I don't found what Thomas said as threatening. The edit can only done by a user who has good reputation point otherwise it need two peer review. So when rolling back you should have a strong reason. The mods will watch because rolling back can be used to abuse the system.So be cool & read FAQ first. | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:35 | answer | added | Panther | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:27 | answer | added | Rinzwind | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:24 | comment | added | jobin | Did I just read a question? | |
| Nov 17, 2013 at 18:19 | history | asked | Indian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |