Timeline for Is it okay to ask for confirmation of a suspected bug?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 14:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Oct 26, 2013 at 15:35 | comment | added | Braiam | For that fact I told you "what is a bug" and "what is not a bug". If it's reproducible and isn't an expected behavior = bug. If it's that you really don't know what you are doing then is a question. Also, you can ask in chat a Seth pointed out. | |
| Oct 26, 2013 at 15:30 | comment | added | matv1 | The practical reason in this case I thought of putting a line in the water on AU is because 1) I will be hitting a much larger target audience (compared to irc or AU chat). 2) The suspected bug does not require intricate configs by other users. I just want a bunch of ppl saying yes I see that happening. Still, this is now a genuine meta discussion as I am atm preparing to submit the bug. Still like to hear if my comment changed anyones mind :) | |
| Oct 26, 2013 at 15:30 | comment | added | matv1 | mhm I agree with the supplied anwers in themselves. But they are anwering my question with the assumption that we know for a fact that it's a bug. The definition Braiam supplies is limited to that. That wasn't my question exactly: I want to find out whether we are (with reasonable certainty) dealing with a bug or not. If I get a yes on that, sure I will do an LP submit. And with that, the process of bug tracking starts. | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 20:10 | comment | added | Seth | You could ask in the chat though. | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 17:35 | history | edited | Thomas WardMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Oct 25, 2013 at 15:30 | history | answered | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |