Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 21, 2013 at 15:15 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/381436615136411649
Sep 18, 2013 at 19:27 comment added coteyr I reject any edit that changes the "meaning" or "result" of a posting. This added a result (changes the result), but wasn't by the original author.
Sep 17, 2013 at 7:26 vote accept Raja G
Sep 17, 2013 at 1:43 comment added Seth @TomBrossman Usually when this happens it is the OP, except he can't edit anymore because he didn't register and his cookies got cleared. Anyway, in this case if the editor was not the OP they should just ask a new question anyways.
Sep 16, 2013 at 22:13 comment added Tom Brossman @Seth If the person editing is the OP they can already edit without needing approval. I agree comments are less useful but 2 accounts = 2 people, unless they explain themselves. I don't assume the person editing is the OP.
Sep 16, 2013 at 6:25 history edited Thomas WardMod
edited tags
Sep 16, 2013 at 0:14 comment added Seth @TomBrossman If the person trying to edit is the OP they should not add this information as a comment, rather edit it in (like they're trying to do) so that people don't have to hunt through the comments to find important information.
Sep 15, 2013 at 22:29 answer added fossfreedomMod timeline score: 18
Sep 15, 2013 at 21:50 comment added Tom Brossman I reject these too, this kind of thing should be added as a comment instead.
Sep 15, 2013 at 20:57 comment added Seth I normally approve them, as do most reviewers AFIAK.
Sep 15, 2013 at 12:21 comment added Braiam Well, I normally reject those, as all in fair, I have no way to know if it's the same user, or another user with a "me too" case. One of the reasons I wanted this implemented.
Sep 15, 2013 at 5:03 history asked Raja G CC BY-SA 3.0