Timeline for Version tags are being used improperly -- what to do?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2013 at 15:27 | vote | accept | Andrea Corbellini | ||
| Sep 8, 2013 at 15:36 | comment | added | Braiam | @EliahKagan you are relying in the ability of the reviewer to know which are the proper tags for each post. I'm writing a meta question with resources for the reviewers so nobody can say it's not there. | |
| Aug 30, 2013 at 16:47 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | @guntbert It should ideally be done when the new posts are reviewed. As for big batches, it's true that sustained mass editing could prevent other posts from being seen. But there's nothing wrong with editing a lot of posts if they're really being improved. Every time a post that does not appear on the front page is edited (well, almost every time), it pushes something off the front page. Whether the edits are done in quick succession or spread over an extended period, the same number of posts are pushed off (and can come back). The harm from medium-high volume editing is often overstated. | |
| Aug 30, 2013 at 16:42 | comment | added | guntbert | One problem I encountered on this route: edited questions all are pushed forward and so it is nothing which can/should be done in big batches. | |
| Aug 30, 2013 at 16:27 | history | answered | Eliah Kagan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |