Timeline for Review Suspension not in FAQ
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 8:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Jul 30, 2013 at 2:40 | answer | added | Seth | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 27, 2013 at 18:05 | comment | added | Seth | I'll add an answer later. | |
Jul 27, 2013 at 2:01 | comment | added | Adrian Keister | @Seth: Your comment is really the answer to my question. I'll +1 it if you convert it to an answer. | |
Jul 27, 2013 at 0:45 | comment | added | Adrian Keister | 500 rep for that privilege sounds fine. I think there ought to be a significant amount of material on training users in so that they know the most-frequent offenders, that sort of thing. | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 22:21 | answer | added | OliMod | timeline score: 0 | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 22:14 | history | edited | Seth |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 26, 2013 at 22:13 | comment | added | Seth | No, you haven't been suspended from review. You would get a message if you had been. A recent change (like yesterday) makes review now require 500 reputation. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/186373/… and downvote if you disagree ;) | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 22:05 | comment | added | Adrian Keister | I suppose I'm asking for a feature, so could someone please add that tag as well? Thanks! | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 22:03 | history | asked | Adrian Keister | CC BY-SA 3.0 |