Timeline for Custom close reason review
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 8:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jul 11, 2013 at 22:02 | comment | added | Seth | @EliahKagan I agree 100%. Do you think a close reason of "Obsolete" would cover the gaps left my TL? See the bottom of my answer here: meta.stackexchange.com/a/185129/203389 Also, very well commented questions don't usually get their comments read since there are so many.. | |
| Jul 11, 2013 at 22:00 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | I think if a problem mysteriously went away and there's not enough information to answer the question, the question should be closed (as we've always done). But I also agree: The off-topic close reason is poorly suited to this. The purpose of the new close reasons is to make SE more transparent and intuitive. It's not intuitive that a problem would become off-topic because the information necessary to solve it became inaccessible. I think this may also make reviewing more difficult and/or cause incorrect "Leave Open" reviews unless the questions are very well commented. | |
| Jul 11, 2013 at 16:14 | history | answered | Seth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |