Skip to main content
grammar
Source Link
Eliah Kagan
  • 118.9k
  • 3
  • 45
  • 122

The point of Stack Exchange is to create reusable questions and answers that benefit many people (or at least as many as are interested in the topic they cover).

Therefore, and without intending any disrespect, it's irrelevant that the OP already knows about Firefox and Chrome. That would be a good reason for the OP to pre-emptively post answers about them. It is not a good reason to restrict the scope of the answer in such a specific and artificial way.

With that said, there are very, very many web browsers out there. I suspect this should be considered a "big list" question and closed (and perhaps locked for posterity / historical interest, so it is not deleted). Which web browserbrowsers are listed there will always be arbitrary and the list is unlikely to be maintained well.

But whether or not we're going to close it, yeah, editing out the Chrome/FF restriction (which I am taken to understand has now been done) was the right thing to do.

The point of Stack Exchange is to create reusable questions and answers that benefit many people (or at least as many as are interested in the topic they cover).

Therefore, and without intending any disrespect, it's irrelevant that the OP already knows about Firefox and Chrome. That would be a good reason for the OP to pre-emptively post answers about them. It is not a good reason to restrict the scope of the answer in such a specific and artificial way.

With that said, there are very, very many web browsers out there. I suspect this should be considered a "big list" question and closed (and perhaps locked for posterity / historical interest, so it is not deleted). Which web browser are listed there will always be arbitrary and the list is unlikely to be maintained well.

But whether or not we're going to close it, yeah, editing out the Chrome/FF restriction (which I am taken to understand has now been done) was the right thing to do.

The point of Stack Exchange is to create reusable questions and answers that benefit many people (or at least as many as are interested in the topic they cover).

Therefore, and without intending any disrespect, it's irrelevant that the OP already knows about Firefox and Chrome. That would be a good reason for the OP to pre-emptively post answers about them. It is not a good reason to restrict the scope of the answer in such a specific and artificial way.

With that said, there are very, very many web browsers out there. I suspect this should be considered a "big list" question and closed (and perhaps locked for posterity / historical interest, so it is not deleted). Which web browsers are listed there will always be arbitrary and the list is unlikely to be maintained well.

But whether or not we're going to close it, yeah, editing out the Chrome/FF restriction (which I am taken to understand has now been done) was the right thing to do.

Source Link
Eliah Kagan
  • 118.9k
  • 3
  • 45
  • 122

The point of Stack Exchange is to create reusable questions and answers that benefit many people (or at least as many as are interested in the topic they cover).

Therefore, and without intending any disrespect, it's irrelevant that the OP already knows about Firefox and Chrome. That would be a good reason for the OP to pre-emptively post answers about them. It is not a good reason to restrict the scope of the answer in such a specific and artificial way.

With that said, there are very, very many web browsers out there. I suspect this should be considered a "big list" question and closed (and perhaps locked for posterity / historical interest, so it is not deleted). Which web browser are listed there will always be arbitrary and the list is unlikely to be maintained well.

But whether or not we're going to close it, yeah, editing out the Chrome/FF restriction (which I am taken to understand has now been done) was the right thing to do.