Timeline for Re-opening a misunderstood question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Dec 23, 2012 at 20:16 | vote | accept | SuperElectric | ||
| Dec 23, 2012 at 20:14 | comment | added | nanofarad | @AbrahamVanHelpsing See meta.askubuntu.com/questions/5576/… | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 20:07 | comment | added | RobotHumans | related: askubuntu.com/questions/232136/… | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 19:59 | answer | added | Bruno PereiraMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 19:51 | comment | added | RobotHumans | @ObsessiveSSOℲ Another meta on "Are custom kernels considered custom distros" might be good. If someone wants to field it, sure, but they need to field the question not me. | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 19:50 | comment | added | nanofarad | @AbrahamVanHelpsing Can you point out an example question where custom kernel implied OT? Ir shall I start a meta post? | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 19:46 | comment | added | RobotHumans | Custom kernels is OT imo and constitutes a custom distro. Custom kernel and proxy setting are definitely two completely different things. | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 19:42 | comment | added | nanofarad | @AbrahamVanHelpsing Perhaps that comment would be better in the original question, where it would help if the question is reopened, or passerby arrive at it by way of searching? | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 19:28 | comment | added | RobotHumans | From reading the question, it sounds like loadable modules for all of your devices is compiled out of your kernel. This will obviously break all hardware autodetection. In my experience, new hardware recognition in Ubuntu does not require the redhat-y xfree86config and all the hardware re-scanning. | |
| Dec 23, 2012 at 19:22 | history | asked | SuperElectric | CC BY-SA 3.0 |