Skip to main content
Added strikethrough.
Source Link
Nathan Osman
  • 32.4k
  • 1
  • 49
  • 75

Recently we see edit suggestions that mainly format text with a lot of markup that to my opinion do not always increase but sometimes reduce the clarity of a post.

People do have a different view on how much formatting is of benefit (I myself like to use it rather often) but there is a certain limit above of which a text will be too spotted.

When too much of markup is added by an edit suggestion we may also be faced with people refusing this edit just because of this and thus we may lose otherwise helpful other improvements.

When we format we do so to HIGHLIGHT all parts of the text or make other parts smallor or float above all.
#Is this really needed?

or 

##not?

When would adding markup be worth to justify an edit?

Recently we see edit suggestions that mainly format text with a lot of markup that to my opinion do not always increase but sometimes reduce the clarity of a post.

People do have a different view on how much formatting is of benefit (I myself like to use it rather often) but there is a certain limit above of which a text will be too spotted.

When too much of markup is added by an edit suggestion we may also be faced with people refusing this edit just because of this and thus we may lose otherwise helpful other improvements.

When we format we do so to HIGHLIGHT parts of the text or make other parts smallor float above all.
#Is this really needed?

or 

##not?

When would adding markup be worth to justify an edit?

Recently we see edit suggestions that mainly format text with a lot of markup that to my opinion do not always increase but sometimes reduce the clarity of a post.

People do have a different view on how much formatting is of benefit (I myself like to use it rather often) but there is a certain limit above of which a text will be too spotted.

When too much of markup is added by an edit suggestion we may also be faced with people refusing this edit just because of this and thus we may lose otherwise helpful other improvements.

When we format we do so to HIGHLIGHT all parts of the text or make other parts small or float above all.
#Is this really needed?

or 

##not?

When would adding markup be worth to justify an edit?

deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
N.N.
  • 18.4k
  • 1
  • 16
  • 32

Recently we see edit suggestions that mainly format text with a lot of markup that to my opinion do not always increase but sometimes reduce the clarity of a post.

People do have a different view on how much formatting is of benefit (I myself like to use it rather often) but there is a certain limit above of which a text will be too spottledspotted.

When too much of markup is added by an edit suggestion we may also be faced with people refusing this edit just because of this and thus we may lose otherwise helpful other improvements.

When we format we do so to HIGHLIGHT parts of the text or make other parts smallor float above all.
#Is this really needed?

or 

##not?

When would adding markup be worth to justify an edit?

Recently we see edit suggestions that mainly format text with a lot of markup that to my opinion do not always increase but sometimes reduce the clarity of a post.

People do have a different view on how much formatting is of benefit (I myself like to use it rather often) but there is a certain limit above of which a text will be too spottled.

When too much of markup is added by an edit suggestion we may also be faced with people refusing this edit just because of this and thus we may lose otherwise helpful other improvements.

When we format we do so to HIGHLIGHT parts of the text or make other parts smallor float above all.
#Is this really needed?

or 

##not?

When would adding markup be worth to justify an edit?

Recently we see edit suggestions that mainly format text with a lot of markup that to my opinion do not always increase but sometimes reduce the clarity of a post.

People do have a different view on how much formatting is of benefit (I myself like to use it rather often) but there is a certain limit above of which a text will be too spotted.

When too much of markup is added by an edit suggestion we may also be faced with people refusing this edit just because of this and thus we may lose otherwise helpful other improvements.

When we format we do so to HIGHLIGHT parts of the text or make other parts smallor float above all.
#Is this really needed?

or 

##not?

When would adding markup be worth to justify an edit?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/272868150196973569
Source Link
Takkat
  • 143.7k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 34

How much markup is tolerated?

Recently we see edit suggestions that mainly format text with a lot of markup that to my opinion do not always increase but sometimes reduce the clarity of a post.

People do have a different view on how much formatting is of benefit (I myself like to use it rather often) but there is a certain limit above of which a text will be too spottled.

When too much of markup is added by an edit suggestion we may also be faced with people refusing this edit just because of this and thus we may lose otherwise helpful other improvements.

When we format we do so to HIGHLIGHT parts of the text or make other parts smallor float above all.
#Is this really needed?

or 

##not?

When would adding markup be worth to justify an edit?