Timeline for Regarding "Low Quality" flag
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2012 at 11:38 | answer | added | Bruno PereiraMod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 20, 2012 at 6:16 | answer | added | poolie | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 1:52 | comment | added | Knowledge Cube | Also related: meta.askubuntu.com/q/1948/18612 | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 16:28 | comment | added | Octavian Helm | This question might be related. Is the “very low quality” flag necessary? | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 16:17 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | @OctavianDamiean there's several flags in the past-30-days flags queue I have which match "Low Quality" and "Declined - [see above reason]" as the response. Since that seems to be the general response to these flags, I am not seeking additional info about why it was declined as such, but rather the removal fo that type of flag outright. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Octavian Helm | It might help if you would post the question or answer that you have flagged. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 16:08 | answer | added | Jorge Castro | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 16:03 | history | asked | Thomas WardMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |