Timeline for Request: Burnination and Blacklisting of [error] tag
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 14:25 | history | edited | jrg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
ok, devils advocate i am.
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 14:24 | history | undeleted | jrg | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 12:27 | history | deleted | jrg | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 3:04 | comment | added | jrg | One is mine, and I up voted because I think it's a good question that needs to be hashed out. I'm merely offering my point of view. :) | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 3:00 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | just to point out, this already has two upvotes, so i think there's more people who agree with me on this :P | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 1:55 | comment | added | jrg | @ThomasWard In theory yes. However, we can edit those that don't belong there and aren't off-topic, but I'm all in favor of keeping it around if we can kill off-topic stuff easily - because to be blunt, we can't stop it from getting on the site in the first place, and as I said, having it in one place will help. A lot. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 1:49 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | Doesn't that equate to the definition of a 'meta tag' in the sense that its purpose does not exist? in theory, having a tag that consists of questions which can work in 30 thousand other tags, is bad form, even if it does help catch offtopic questions. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 1:48 | history | answered | jrg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |