Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 27, 2023 at 17:03 answer added user.dz timeline score: 1
Jul 8, 2023 at 1:00 history edited CommunityBot
Jun 6, 2023 at 18:04 history became hot meta post
Jun 5, 2023 at 20:24 comment added starball Note that Slate's comment here says (emphasis added) "While we evaluate, we hope that folks on network sites feel comfortable establishing per-site policies responsive to their communities’ needs." I.e. according to the wording there, that allowance has a condition variable.
Jun 5, 2023 at 18:06 answer added NotTheDr01ds timeline score: 11
Jun 4, 2023 at 19:25 answer added Levente timeline score: 7
Jun 4, 2023 at 16:12 comment added Starship openletter.mousetail.nl please join the strike
Jun 3, 2023 at 16:48 comment added Levente "may be turning away a large number of legitimate contributors" — contributing what, exactly? Also, they sacrifice the factual integrity of the content for the number of user accounts, because they get paid for the latter, and not the former. Stackexchange should have been made non-profit.
Jun 3, 2023 at 12:18 answer added C.S.Cameron timeline score: -17
Jun 3, 2023 at 5:51 answer added ZannaMod timeline score: 9
Jun 3, 2023 at 4:31 history edited cocomac CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Jun 2, 2023 at 23:15 answer added andrew.46Mod timeline score: 27
Jun 2, 2023 at 22:59 history edited terdon CC BY-SA 4.0
added 139 characters in body
Jun 2, 2023 at 22:18 comment added terdon I should also point out that the private policy shared with moderators (yes, they told us one thing and you another and we're not allowed to share) is much more restrictive than what can be seen here. What you have is a description of the policy, not the explanation of the "strict standard" we've been asked to apply.
Jun 2, 2023 at 20:35 history edited andrew.46Mod CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags
Jun 2, 2023 at 20:19 history asked terdon CC BY-SA 4.0