Timeline for how come answers and questions are banned without feedback
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2023 at 15:26 | answer | added | OliMod | timeline score: 6 | |
May 18, 2023 at 16:01 | comment | added | fred | Surely, the question is general and not specific. Surely, banning 3 answers, and on one i would probably agree, without providing a reason is less than efficient and productive for the community. If I recall correctly I also earned a badge for another answer. This means the system has partial and unweighted records on which to decide. Alas, at least it seems it was not phrased so badly this time round. Thnx for feedback | |
May 18, 2023 at 3:15 | comment | added | andrew.46 Mod | On looking at your history on AU I can see that 3 of your answers have been deleted without any information added as to why this occurred. The deletions were by a combination of elected and community moderators. In all 3 cases the answers were rightfully removed, IMHO, but I believe a shortcoming in these cases is that there was no explanation appended. And in this Ask Ubuntu should often do better... | |
May 17, 2023 at 17:33 | answer | added | Nmath | timeline score: 3 | |
May 17, 2023 at 16:11 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 2, 2023 at 3:04 | |||||
May 17, 2023 at 15:44 | comment | added | user535733 | The question seems unproperly phrased to me: I cannot tell what kind of problem you are having. Use your vocabulary. Use grammar and punctuation that others will recognize. Try be factual; describe clearly, avoid complaining. Try to ask a single, clear question that is also answerable by the community. It's on you to communicate the problem effectively to those of us who were not there. | |
May 17, 2023 at 15:21 | history | migrated | from askubuntu.com (revisions) | ||
May 17, 2023 at 14:02 | history | asked | fred | CC BY-SA 4.0 |