Timeline for Unwanted edits to my question in ask Ubuntu
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 9:43 | comment | added | muru | @SteveInBavaria it's automated. It's a known problem that the selection process is no indicator of quality of the post. There are numerous discussions on Meta Stack Exchange about this, including, for example: meta.stackexchange.com/q/238420/270345 meta.stackexchange.com/q/317418/270345 meta.stackexchange.com/q/334877/270345 meta.stackexchange.com/q/245390/270345 meta.stackexchange.com/q/327207/270345 meta.stackexchange.com/q/284929/270345 | |
| Jun 10, 2020 at 9:26 | answer | added | Jacob Vlijm | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 10, 2020 at 6:32 | vote | accept | SteveInBavaria | ||
| Jun 10, 2020 at 3:48 | answer | added | ZannaMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 20:00 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | Also the lock is temporary - i hate rollback wars and having to squash edits and such, but there are a lot of cases where that devolves into a constant war - so my apologies for having to step in and come up with a 'compromise' in this case. (I really dislike doing it but it's one of the tasks and powers moderators sometimes have to exercise heh.) | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 19:56 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | Emotional is when you take a technically perfect edit personal, and refuse to accept it because you want to keep it YOUR version. Using upvotes in a single situation as an argument to get your way is, well yes, horrible. Actual arguments is what counts only. Both in the real world as well as on AU. | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 18:24 | comment | added | SteveInBavaria | What's all this talk of "horrible,horrible" arguments about? Is that how people answer questions on this forum? Isn't it all a bit emotional? | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 18:10 | history | edited | SteveInBavaria | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jun 9, 2020 at 17:28 | comment | added | Glorfindel | It's even a more horrible argument since all but two of the upvotes occurred after it became a Hot Network Question, i.e. it has been voted on by users like me with no Ubuntu knowledge at all. | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 17:06 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | You are using votes as an argument, which is in both the real world as well as on AU a horrible, horrible one. If MY question is upvoted 100x or by the whole world, but is technically incorrect, it should be improved. "After all I just want to be allowed to keep my own, perfectly understandable and accurate, title to my own question - if it's incorrect -> no. I'd be happy if someone improves it. | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 16:58 | comment | added | muru | How surprising. I suppose ar, tar, dpkg and the Ubuntu Software app are also named after apt? | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 16:55 | comment | added | SteveInBavaria | Surely APTitude and synAPTtic are so named after the Advanced Package Tool or apt. | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 16:46 | comment | added | muru | I don't care much either way, but I really don't think the question has anything to do with the apt tag. It absolutely does not matter to what you're asking at its core whether the non-snap version was installed via apt, aptitude, synaptic, the software centre or via dpkg or even via manually extracting the deb file. | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 16:31 | history | asked | SteveInBavaria | CC BY-SA 4.0 |