Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 28, 2019 at 14:14 comment added terdon Mod @clearkimura well, votes are as personal as bounties. People may vote as they please (as long as they're not abusing the system by serial voting or the like). I would argue none of this is your problem: if you want to award a bounty to an answer, then that's your right. That said, OPs can and do sometimes accept bad or even wrong answers, so downvoting an accepted answer may well be a perfectly reasonable thing to do.
Jul 28, 2019 at 14:11 comment added user37165 @terdon I have seen this before: OP had accepted the most voted answer for a question; later, some users disagreed and commented "OP should have accepted this answer" and people would up-vote "this answer" and the accepted ones would be down-voted. That might not be same with bounties: Say if a bounty is given to a good answer with zero votes, people may disagree by casting down-vote that zero votes answer and the result is an answer with some -N votes with the permanent bounty. This is one unintended result that I am trying to avoid.
Jul 28, 2019 at 12:26 comment added terdon Mod @clearkimura not really. The main point is that it's your bounty and you can award it to whichever answer you want. Worst case scenario, if you give it to a non-answer which is deleted, you will have wasted your points and your efforts, but it's still your call. Just like accepting an answer, awarding a bounty is a personal choice and nobody gets to tell you which answer to give it to.
Jul 28, 2019 at 12:24 history edited terdonMod CC BY-SA 4.0
"shall" doesn't really work there :)
Jul 28, 2019 at 5:27 comment added user37165 So basically: Decision is on whom started the bounty; both mixed votes and zero votes do not necessarily mean bad answers; bounties should be awarded to not just good answers, but outstanding answers. +1
Jul 27, 2019 at 19:00 history answered Byte CommanderMod CC BY-SA 4.0