Timeline for Do we still really need to ask people to accept answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 19, 2019 at 6:21 | comment | added | pomsky | @Dan Is that always the case? Here's a hypothetical example: suppose there is a question related to a very specific hardware. There is an identical question about the same hardware with an answer. Now I wouldn't upvote the answer even though it "looks valid" to me as I am unable to explicitly check the validity of the answer (don't have the specific hardware). In that case the fact that the answer is accepted is good enough for me to consider it as a valid candidate for a dupe. It's quite hard to always have 5 reviewers/close-voters with firsthand experience, especially for a niche question. | |
Mar 18, 2019 at 12:32 | comment | added | Dan | @Pilot6 But that's by design for a good reason, in my opinion. The system won't allow that for a good reason, as it considers the other question as answered. And there is an easy solution to overcome if the answer to that question is valid in one's opinion. They just upvote the answer. If they don't think it's worthy of an upvote, then it shouldn't be worthy to be a valid candidate for a dupe. | |
Mar 16, 2019 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/1106933286079729669 | ||
Mar 16, 2019 at 11:00 | comment | added | Pilot6 | If an answer is not accepted or upvoted, we can't close similar questions as dupes. | |
Mar 16, 2019 at 2:48 | answer | added | Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 15, 2019 at 22:59 | answer | added | pomsky | timeline score: 17 | |
Mar 15, 2019 at 16:01 | answer | added | Jacob Vlijm | timeline score: 25 | |
Mar 15, 2019 at 14:50 | history | asked | Dan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |