Skip to main content
Ask Ubuntu

Return to Question

added 76 characters in body
Source Link
Elder Geek
Elder Geek
  • 36.4k
  • 21
  • 44

During review I was presented with https://askubuntu.com/questions/1083052/how-to-connect-to-bigcommerce-webdav-via-18-04-solution At first glance this appears to be just a Question and answer combined and in fact @triplee caught that and commented accordingly.commented accordingly. However, the post goes on to rant about the company that they perceive to be the source of the problem that it intends to solve, even going so far as to name names and link to a Linked in account of a "senior vice president of customer success". This strikes me as both unprofessional and possibly libelous. What would be the best practice to follow in a case such as this?

During review I was presented with https://askubuntu.com/questions/1083052/how-to-connect-to-bigcommerce-webdav-via-18-04-solution At first glance this appears to be just a Question and answer combined and in fact @triplee caught that and commented accordingly. However, the post goes on to rant about the company that they perceive to be the source of the problem that it intends to solve, even going so far as to name names and link to a Linked in account of a "senior vice president of customer success". This strikes me as both unprofessional and possibly libelous. What would be the best practice to follow in a case such as this?

During review I was presented with https://askubuntu.com/questions/1083052/how-to-connect-to-bigcommerce-webdav-via-18-04-solution At first glance this appears to be just a Question and answer combined and in fact @triplee caught that and commented accordingly. However, the post goes on to rant about the company that they perceive to be the source of the problem that it intends to solve, even going so far as to name names and link to a Linked in account of a "senior vice president of customer success". This strikes me as both unprofessional and possibly libelous. What would be the best practice to follow in a case such as this?

Source Link
Elder Geek
Elder Geek
  • 36.4k
  • 21
  • 44

Question and Answer Plus Rant in question box. Best Practices?

During review I was presented with https://askubuntu.com/questions/1083052/how-to-connect-to-bigcommerce-webdav-via-18-04-solution At first glance this appears to be just a Question and answer combined and in fact @triplee caught that and commented accordingly. However, the post goes on to rant about the company that they perceive to be the source of the problem that it intends to solve, even going so far as to name names and link to a Linked in account of a "senior vice president of customer success". This strikes me as both unprofessional and possibly libelous. What would be the best practice to follow in a case such as this?