Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

0:-)

###Why?

Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things and is more welcoming...

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

###Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things and is more welcoming...

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming?

Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

0:-)

Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things and is more welcoming...

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

Updated Question
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

###Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things and is more welcoming...

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

###Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things.

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

###Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things and is more welcoming...

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

Updated Question
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

###Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things.

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

First of all: Please stop thinking:

and start thinking:

Are you still OK??? You're thinking joss sticks and whale songs already? :-) Well then, as we're currently on a move towards becoming more welcoming to be able to expand our user base on the SE network, including visible warnings like these:

New Contributor

wouldn't it be a good idea to have the SE employees review the size limit of any close reason upwards so that we can make all the close reason comments more welcoming? ###Example:

This question has been asked before and already has an answer [here]()

Say exactly what needs to be said but we need to review these again and be able to open a few meta questions to get input from the community and do things like:

Hello, we think your question is very similar or equal to [link here]() and the x answer(s) provided there might help you solve your problem. If it does not, please [edit] your question and provide feedback on what you tried and what went wrong for all the answers there! Keep up the good work!

(just testing the grounds before taking this to [meta.se] seeing what other people think here first.)

###0:-)

###Why?

The former elicits "No, I'm unique, my question is different" whereas the second one tells you to try all answers not just the accepted one and to comment everything you've tried and not just the obvious things.

Note¹: Definition of standard system-wide comments: Flag comments, From review comments, Duplicate comments and the comments that are left once the question is closed as a dupe, ... = any comment that the SE site generates are very to to point but none are welcoming.
Note²: apparently there is an app for that but not everyone is using the app.
Note³: I use gedit and have my own comments txt file but I'd like for the standard to be more welcoming...

Updated Answer
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47
Loading
Updated Question
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47
Loading
Post Undeleted by Fabby
Post Deleted by Fabby
Updated Question
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47
Loading
Post Undeleted by Fabby
Post Deleted by Fabby
Updated Question
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47
Loading
Updated Question
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47
Loading
Updated Question
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47
Loading
Source Link
Fabby
  • 34.5k
  • 23
  • 47
Loading