Timeline for What to do about good suggested edits with very bad summaries?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2018 at 22:37 | comment | added | wjandrea | @EliahKagan Yeah. Maybe it would be better to approve the edit, and leave a comment for the editor on the question. | |
| Apr 20, 2018 at 23:56 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | I don't think I'd go as far as rejecting an edit I knew was good on the grounds that the summary was bad (unless the summary were so bad that it would require moderator intervention if approved... which fortunately is rare). However, there is at least one situation where I feel strongly that the sentiment you've expressed here is correct. When there is reasonable concern that an edit may be introducing incorrect information into a question, and the edit summary does not fully address that possibility, then I think reviewers should quickly reject it. | |
| Apr 20, 2018 at 19:35 | history | answered | wjandrea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |