Timeline for Isn't it time to review the algorithm for letting good answers flow to the top?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 20, 2018 at 14:01 | comment | added | Fabby | I'm proposing to change "Votes" to not give the accepted answer any more precedence than just the votes it has... Please let me know if that was not clear from the question. | |
Apr 20, 2018 at 11:20 | comment | added | Be Brave Be Like Ukraine | @Fabby Oh, wait a minute. There is a tab bar in the top-right corner above the answers, and it is sticky across the entire site. There are three options "active/oldest/votes". Are you just suggesting adding yet another option "votes ignoring accepted" or so? This would make sense IMO. | |
Apr 20, 2018 at 11:11 | comment | added | Fabby | One user cannot, a bunch of users could... (or am I missing something?) | |
Apr 20, 2018 at 11:08 | comment | added | Be Brave Be Like Ukraine | @Fabby, but this would be vulnerable to fraud. Imagine an evil user who downvotes your post not because it became factually obsolete, but in partisan preference to a specific tool, revenge voting, or so. | |
Apr 20, 2018 at 3:07 | comment | added | Fabby | I do all that already, that's not the point. The point is the current default sort algorithm for most users doesn't give them what they need as they go looking for "the best" answer and especially downvote and comment would work much better when that gets changed and especially deleting an upvoted answer would become more efficient as well. | |
Apr 19, 2018 at 21:21 | history | edited | Be Brave Be Like Ukraine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Apr 19, 2018 at 21:04 | history | answered | Be Brave Be Like Ukraine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |