Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

Recently in the edit queue, there have been edits that only add <!-- language: bash --> to the post. These edits are made by the same user. And often 5-10 at a time.

Is the color highlighting of code really a necessary edit? Presently I have been skipping them because I don't know if this should be considered an improvement.

Example:

###Example: https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/774796

Recently in the edit queue, there have been edits that only add <!-- language: bash --> to the post. These edits are made by the same user. And often 5-10 at a time.

Is the color highlighting of code really a necessary edit? Presently I have been skipping them because I don't know if this should be considered an improvement.

###Example: https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/774796

Recently in the edit queue, there have been edits that only add <!-- language: bash --> to the post. These edits are made by the same user. And often 5-10 at a time.

Is the color highlighting of code really a necessary edit? Presently I have been skipping them because I don't know if this should be considered an improvement.

Example:

https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/774796

Tweeted twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/930558316752842753
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
guntbert
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 17
  • 33

Recently in the edit cuequeue, there have been edits that only add <!-- language: bash --> to the post. These edits are made by the same user. And often 5-10 at a time.

Is the color highlighting of code really a necessary edit? Presently I have been skipping them because I don't know if this should be considered an improvement.

###Example: https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/774796

Recently in the edit cue, there have been edits that only add <!-- language: bash --> to the post. These edits are made by the same user. And often 5-10 at a time.

Is the color highlighting of code really a necessary edit? Presently I have been skipping them because I don't know if this should be considered an improvement.

###Example: https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/774796

Recently in the edit queue, there have been edits that only add <!-- language: bash --> to the post. These edits are made by the same user. And often 5-10 at a time.

Is the color highlighting of code really a necessary edit? Presently I have been skipping them because I don't know if this should be considered an improvement.

###Example: https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/774796

Source Link
ravery
  • 6.9k
  • 7
  • 10

What to do with <!-- language: bash --> edits?

Recently in the edit cue, there have been edits that only add <!-- language: bash --> to the post. These edits are made by the same user. And often 5-10 at a time.

Is the color highlighting of code really a necessary edit? Presently I have been skipping them because I don't know if this should be considered an improvement.

###Example: https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/774796