Timeline for Problem with the review section
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | SethMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:59 | vote | accept | Mostafa Ahangarha | ||
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:54 | answer | added | terdonMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:45 | comment | added | Mostafa Ahangarha | I think you are right since the answer which is accepted also refers to 'why' and not 'how'. So I think I was wrong in interpreting the intention of the question. | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:37 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Thats just my observation on it, you should wait for others too. | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:35 | comment | added | Mostafa Ahangarha | Hmmm. That sounds logical. Should I delete my question here? | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:27 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | 1 The question does not ask how, it asks why, it is not claiming anything, it asks why it is like this. 2 Both your duplicates answer the how but the OP never asked how, they asked why, so they are not duplicates. | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:20 | history | asked | Mostafa Ahangarha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |