Timeline for What's your view on marking historical questions as dupes of your question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2017 at 21:23 | history | edited | Elder Geek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
correction
|
| Jan 4, 2017 at 15:02 | comment | added | Elder Geek | @DmitryGrigoryev I would think that one should take that on a case by case basis as it should depend on the specific circumstances to some degree whether to dupe or merge. I've been attempting to get a [discussion] (meta.askubuntu.com/questions/16361/…) going on this topic. Sadly, the only opinions currently represented there are my own. | |
| Jan 2, 2017 at 11:23 | comment | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | Actually, one can mark an answered question as a duplicate (example), though perhaps one shouldn't do that since there's no point. | |
| Jan 1, 2017 at 18:17 | history | answered | Elder Geek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |