This was just brought to my attention by this question.
From meta.semeta.se a question can be removed
If the question is more than 30 days old, and ...
- has −1 or lower score
- has no answers
- is not locked
Does this not seem extreme? Questions can be answered months later and, as pointed out in the previous question, this can be easily exploited.
If I did not like a question, I could just wait 30 days, vote it down and it would be removed?
Is it just me, or is this far to heavy handed?
I am not advocating for a change exactly but I would really like to here others opinions on this rule, do you like it?
Perhaps 90 days or -3 would be better here?
Please discuss.
