This was just brought to my attention by [this question][1].

From [meta.se][2] a question can be removed

> If the question is more than 30 days old, and ...
> 
>  - has −1 or lower score
>  - has no answers
>  - is not locked

Does this not seem extreme? Questions can be answered months later and, as pointed out in the previous question, this can be easily exploited.

If I did not like a question, I could just wait 30 days, vote it down and it would be removed?

Is it just me, or is this far to heavy handed?

I am not advocating for a change exactly but I would really like to here others opinions on this rule, do you like it? 

Perhaps 90 days or -3 would be better here?

Please discuss.


  [1]: http://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/16489/serial-downvote-how-to-make-it-stop-tired-of-having-my-questions-deleted/16490#16490
  [2]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/a/92006/300925