Timeline for Behavior of Site when Marking Test Questions as Duplicates / Commenting on Test Questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 17:57 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 15, 2017 at 17:48 | history | edited | UTF-8 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 239 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2017 at 3:40 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 8, 2017 at 3:29 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 3:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 3:02 | answer | added | Elder Geek | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 12:26 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | You should flag the copy, do it on the original question to bypass the review and just skip the review, so you don't fail, then a mod can look at the copy and take action. That is about all you can do. | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 12:21 | comment | added | UTF-8 | As I understood it, you just look whether the comments are the same / the number of upvotes is the same / OP's username is the same / whatever. If there is a derivation, you take from that that is a test click on "no action needed". But if what you got to review really was a copy of a quesiton/answer someone else posted earlier, you shouldn't press "no action needed" when reviewing the plagiarization. | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 12:17 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | I am not sure I understand your question. In what context? | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 12:15 | comment | added | UTF-8 | @MarkKirby What if someone actually copied a question or answer of a different person? | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 11:28 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | The only point of an audit is to make sure people are paying attention, in that respect, they do work. What I do to avoid this situation is, always open the original post and if you notice a difference, it was a audit :) | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 1:38 | comment | added | Elder Geek | You aren't alone. Don't let it bother you. | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 19:44 | history | edited | UTF-8 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected grammatical mistake.
|
| Oct 27, 2016 at 20:08 | comment | added | Zanna Mod | Haha VTC an audit as a dupe of itself has happened to me more than once >_< | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 20:04 | history | asked | UTF-8 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |