Timeline for Changing canonical questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2017 at 11:43 | history | edited | ZannaMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
correct typo (since this is a timely time to bump the post)
|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 6:51 | comment | added | Fabby | @AndroidDev: Good! ;-) | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 22:32 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @Fabby - I haven't finished it yet. It's going to be very high-quality with lots of screenshots and everything, but I've been really busy, so I haven't had much time to work on it. I'll ping you with the link when it is done though :) | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 20:55 | comment | added | Fabby | Hey, where is your answer? I went to look for it to see if it was worth upvoting, but coulnd't find anything! | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:54 | answer | added | Jorge Castro | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:52 | answer | added | ZannaMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:26 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - See updated post. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:25 | history | edited | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:22 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - I know, I'm working on a better edit as I type this. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:20 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | That was a really lazy edit, not exactly going to get your point across. You need to give details of WHY the other answers are wrong and should be removed or the question needs to be closed. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:16 | history | edited | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:15 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Then you need to explain all that in your post and give good detail why your answer would be better. If answers are objectively wrong, you can ask mods to remove them, no one wants wrong answers. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:13 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - I'm not trying to rep farm. But the current highest-voted answer is wrong on many counts, the biggest of which is it won't even work for 64-bit Ubuntu. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:10 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Then it is exactly like that, you don't want to compete. Can you give a reason why your answer is so good, a whole new question need to be created? That is the angle you need to come at this form, you need to justify a whole new question, at the expense of closing a very popular one. "It's just that I don't think anybody will ever bother to even try my answer if it's buried at the very bottom." You are wrong, your answer is the newest, many people will look for up to date answers over high voted ones. I have added to old questions and made good rep. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:10 | history | edited | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:05 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - No, it's not like that at all. It's just that I don't think anybody will ever bother to even try my answer if it's buried at the very bottom. :( | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:00 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Firstly, it is really arrogant to assume your answer will be the best. Basically you are saying "I don't want to compete with the other answers, my answer is so good that the other question can just be closed and send all the votes to me". That is not how the site works, you can answer the question if you want and if the answer is taht good, you don't need to think about the others, you will get votes anyway. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 19:02 | comment | added | Anwar | What about adding another answer on that question? | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 18:52 | history | asked | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |