Skip to main content

Timeline for Mint "tag warning" proposal

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
Oct 26, 2016 at 15:24 answer added Anwar timeline score: 2
Oct 25, 2016 at 20:47 comment added Thomas Ward Mod My main concern is that if we are implementing this for one tag that's not an Ubuntu OS, how far will we have to extend that? I agree that this is a good idea, but I"m not sure how "wide spread" this would have to extend to really be captured.
Oct 25, 2016 at 20:33 comment added Thomas Ward Mod I meant tracking for "Other OSes", not tracking for the warnings that are being triggered. Which is what I was trying to say about the reason they didn't chose "Other OSes" to begin with. Just like tracking for EOL releases.
Oct 25, 2016 at 20:25 comment added You'reAGitForNotUsingGit @ThomasWard - It seems like they have "decent tracking" in place... meta.askubuntu.com/a/15207/518562
Oct 25, 2016 at 20:22 comment added Thomas Ward Mod Just a word of caution: this tag type was intentionally not selected when Tag Warnings were first being tested/implemented on Ask Ubuntu, because "these warnings are about pushing questions away, we really want decent tracking in place before doing that." (from Thomas Orozco, in this other Meta thread); for this to be reliably implemented, I think we need to evaluate whether or not we have such a 'decent tracking' in place for this to work. (For this to work it has to hit all Non Ubuntu OS tags.)
Oct 25, 2016 at 20:17 history asked You'reAGitForNotUsingGit CC BY-SA 3.0