Timeline for Can we expand the migration request options to include softwarerecs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 18, 2017 at 22:12 | vote | accept | Elder Geek | ||
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
Oct 5, 2016 at 18:11 | answer | added | Elder Geek | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 18:02 | comment | added | Elder Geek | @Zanna I see that now. | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 18:01 | comment | added | Zanna Mod | And if it would be closed over there, then we shouldn't migrate it ;) | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 17:57 | comment | added | Elder Geek | @Zanna Be that as it may, the question that prompted this one is vague and provides no specific use case (and as such would be closed at softwarerecs) and still deserves to be closed here. | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 17:43 | comment | added | Zanna Mod | Broadly speaking I guess so, but I'm not the biggest fan of that close reason and if OP specifies use case and features required in appropriate detail they can be good valid questions imho... there are some other meta posts "are software recommendations off topic?" etc (I would look for link but on mobile!) And I think the consensus is they are on topic... | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 17:35 | comment | added | Elder Geek | @Zanna Would you not agree that such questions are primarily opinion based? | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 17:07 | comment | added | Rinzwind | migrate to meta has been there for along time? and moving other stuff: doubtful. | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 16:52 | comment | added | Zanna Mod | I don't think such questions are off-topic here... | |
Oct 5, 2016 at 16:12 | history | asked | Elder Geek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |