Timeline for Reviewing tool should be less flexible by enforcing the Skip option rigourously
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Aug 13, 2016 at 19:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 13, 2016 at 18:33 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 23, 2016 at 7:18 | |||||
| Aug 13, 2016 at 14:00 | answer | added | terdonMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 13, 2016 at 13:33 | comment | added | Zanna Mod | I totally disagree. What if I want to fix obvious formatting problems (I don't get rep for editing) but still want to skip for some reason, for example I don't understand what a question is about but I suspect someone more familiar with the topic will, or I am not sure whether an answer is correct or not? The queues that users with <2k rep can review are rarely very full anyway. Even if people do use the review queues to find posts to edit, that is fine. There are only a handful of users with <2k who edit many posts afaik. This is a restrictive solution to a problem that, imho, doesn't exist. | |
| Aug 13, 2016 at 12:35 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | First, you cant just do a million edits, there are other limitations , you can only have five pending edit reviews at a time, so you can't just keep editing and it can't be miss used for rep due to a 1k limit on edit rep total and a 2k cut off for any rep gain from editing. I don't see how it is exploitable with these limitations in place. | |
| Aug 13, 2016 at 10:34 | history | edited | user308164 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 13, 2016 at 10:28 | history | asked | user308164 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |