Skip to main content
Ask Ubuntu

Return to Question

Post Closed as "Duplicate" by Mark Kirby, Videonauth, guntbert, Kevin Bowen, amc
warning
Source Link
user527600
user527600

(THIS IS NOT FOR ASKUBUNTU ONLY! THIS IS FOR THE WHOLE STACKEXCHANGE SITES! DO NOT MARK THIS AS DUPE!)

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too. (edit: do not mark this as dupe because it is my own disscussion as to solving it or not)

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too. (edit: do not mark this as dupe because it is my own disscussion as to solving it or not)

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

(THIS IS NOT FOR ASKUBUNTU ONLY! THIS IS FOR THE WHOLE STACKEXCHANGE SITES! DO NOT MARK THIS AS DUPE!)

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too.

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

deleted 75 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Braiam
Braiam
  • 68.5k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 62

Is it me or should a new feature be implanted to counter the spambots, or a new ToS? [not dupe]

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too. (edit: do not mark this as dupe because it is my own disscussion as to solving it or not)

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

SHARE YOUR OPINIONS (btw I want to help out the community and the site)

Is it me or should a new feature be implanted to counter the spambots, or a new ToS? [not dupe]

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too. (edit: do not mark this as dupe because it is my own disscussion as to solving it or not)

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

SHARE YOUR OPINIONS (btw I want to help out the community and the site)

Is it me or should a new feature be implanted to counter the spambots, or a new ToS?

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too. (edit: do not mark this as dupe because it is my own disscussion as to solving it or not)

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

added 91 characters in body
Source Link
user527600
user527600

Is it me or should a new feature be implanted to counter the spambots, or a new ToS? [not dupe]

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too. (edit: do not mark this as dupe because it is my own disscussion as to solving it or not)

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

SHARE YOUR OPINIONS (btw I want to help out the community and the site)

Is it me or should a new feature be implanted to counter the spambots, or a new ToS?

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too.

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

SHARE YOUR OPINIONS (btw I want to help out the community and the site)

Is it me or should a new feature be implanted to counter the spambots, or a new ToS? [not dupe]

Personally, I dont like spambots. And you should too. (edit: do not mark this as dupe because it is my own disscussion as to solving it or not)

Spambots are like your flag wasters, and thank god we have Smokey otherwise this would be in a heap of spam.

Today I had enough.

So my question is, should we add a new feature that can COUNTER the spambots, or a new censoring (keep in mind spambots are product/beauty clickbaits) filter, or a god-damn update to the ToS (terms of service)?

SHARE YOUR OPINIONS (btw I want to help out the community and the site)

added 51 characters in body
Source Link
user527600
user527600
Source Link
user527600
user527600