Timeline for These shouldn't have been downvoted
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jun 9, 2016 at 10:06 | history | edited | Braiam |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 9, 2016 at 7:44 | vote | accept | fosslinux | ||
| Jun 9, 2016 at 6:43 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | The first one likely got downvoted because, looking at the revision history, it was a mess, a big block of output with no formating or anything. It looks good now but when it was first posted, it did not. | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 4:45 | answer | added | Videonauth | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 4:44 | comment | added | Seth Mod | The second question is off-topic because it is about a development issue. The other question seems on-topic enough, but people have different criterion. As long as you vote on the post and not the person, no one is stopping you from using your up/down votes as you like. | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 4:39 | comment | added | edwinksl | The second question isn't particularly clear to be honest. Disclaimer: I didn't downvote either of them. | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 4:25 | history | asked | fosslinux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |