Timeline for Is it ok for my reputation to be edit-based?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 7:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/738272079569670145 | ||
| Jun 2, 2016 at 5:38 | answer | added | Jacob Vlijm | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 20:37 | comment | added | guntbert | No worries, I didn't mean to criticize but I lively remember my disappointment when I "suddenly" lost almost 100 points in the course of 2 months. | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 20:34 | comment | added | anonymous2 | Thank you for the intelligence, officer. Seriously, that's a good point, and I hadn't thought of it. I guess it would have been better on the reviewers' time as well for me to have left that one alone, eh? | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 20:14 | comment | added | guntbert | As an aside: if you improve many posts that remain inherently bad (despite your good edit) you will loose some of those points again when those post get deleted eventually. (e.g. askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/572500 seems to be such a case where your efforts could be better spent elsewhere) | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 18:34 | vote | accept | anonymous2 | ||
| Jun 1, 2016 at 18:33 | answer | added | Fiksdal | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 18:06 | answer | added | RolandiXorMod | timeline score: 21 | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 17:16 | answer | added | Dan | timeline score: 26 | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 17:04 | history | asked | anonymous2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |