Timeline for It seems 15.10 has too many problems, is this natural or Canonical should resolve the bugs? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 11, 2015 at 23:19 | history | closed |
terdon guntbert Mateo hg8 David Foerster |
Not suitable for this site | |
Nov 8, 2015 at 15:18 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 11, 2015 at 23:19 | |||||
Nov 8, 2015 at 15:00 | comment | added | Mateo | 15.10 is the best yet :) | |
Nov 2, 2015 at 20:26 | history | edited | kos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 28 characters in body
|
Nov 2, 2015 at 20:21 | comment | added | SuperSluether | Nah, 15.04 was much more problematic because they switched from upstart to systemd. I even read somewhere that 15.10 was a really quiet release. | |
Nov 2, 2015 at 19:53 | vote | accept | Star OS | ||
Nov 2, 2015 at 19:53 | answer | added | OliMod | timeline score: 8 | |
Nov 2, 2015 at 19:52 | comment | added | Star OS | Maybe it's only sometimes, now it's all 15.04 | |
Nov 2, 2015 at 19:52 | comment | added | Mark Kirby |
Can you provide any examples of the bugs ? Installation issues and driver issues are really common here on any release of Ubuntu, new or not, as you said yourself, "exited noobs" wanting the latest something they don't yet understand, these questions are not necessarily bugs in Ubuntu but user error. Also any bugs related to any 3rd party software is not Canonical's fault. This site is not a good gauge of how buggy the current release is.
|
|
Nov 2, 2015 at 19:51 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | I only see ~300 or so 15.10 questions so far? What leads you to believe that that's an indication of quality? | |
Nov 2, 2015 at 19:35 | history | asked | Star OS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |