Timeline for What should be do with smaller edits?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jun 23, 2015 at 14:24 | vote | accept | coteyr | ||
| Jun 17, 2015 at 23:30 | comment | added | Panther | I think you have to use your judgment. If the edit seems minor and in your opinion does not add value -> reject it. If in doubt, I tend to give credit to the user who took the time to contribute, so I will tend to approve even minor edits. If, however, a user seems to be making so many "minor" edits that I start to feel they are on some sort of personal crusade to fix the INTERNET -> start rejection and or reporting edits / start a discussion on Meta | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 21:30 | answer | added | Fabby | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 21:29 | answer | added | muru | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 21:08 | comment | added | coteyr | askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/428428 is an example of a good edit IMO it made the posting easier to read. | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 21:07 | history | asked | coteyr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |