Timeline for Edits that combine answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2016 at 14:44 | vote | accept | Mark Kirby | ||
| May 8, 2015 at 19:09 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Agreed, it is a strange one, I will skip it and let Oli decide what to do with it, thanks for the input. | |
| May 8, 2015 at 19:07 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | @markkirby I'm not sure what should be done for that particular suggested edit (which I think is still in the queue--I don't think it's been approved as of right now). It does seem like it could improve the post, and there's no clear indication it conflicts with Oli's intent, but at the same time it significantly (by percentage) increases the length of an existing answer to add information that might be considered nonessential. If I were in Oli's shoes, I think I'd approve that edit on my own post. I clicked Skip when I saw that in review. Maybe Oli will decide one way or the other. | |
| May 8, 2015 at 19:04 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Sorry if I was a bit unclear, I don't nessecerily think its "bad" but im just confused about the appropriate action to take, as you say "there might be many combinations of factors that could militate toward or against the edits you've seen being appropriate" | |
| May 8, 2015 at 18:51 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | @markkirby If possible I recommend providing links (and, if you think it's helpful, quotes) in your post rather than a screenshot. Then it will be easier to see the full context, users who cannot view images will be able to understand and participate in the discussion, etc. | |
| May 8, 2015 at 18:50 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Sorry I forgot my screen shot | |
| May 8, 2015 at 18:47 | history | answered | Eliah Kagan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |