Timeline for EOL Policy Revisited: a case for letting Ubuntu questions be on-topic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2014 at 19:30 | history | edited | Kaz Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Make Zalgo point down
|
| Sep 17, 2014 at 19:52 | comment | added | Seth Mod | You have some really good points, and I am going to have to really think about some of them, because I think you are probably right. Nick: Plastering "YOU SHOULD UPGRADE" across every EOL question wouldn't be very efficient at all at all... | |
| Sep 17, 2014 at 17:29 | comment | added | Nick The Swede | Interesting list of reason indeed, although I must admit that being new to the site, some of them obviously went a bit over my head. And thanks for the links, too, they gave me a further sense of the history of this EOL question. Just for clarity, I want to say that my suggestion is not that we should stop recommending people to upgrade, but rather that EOL q:s should be allow so that if there are solutions to the OP's EOL problem someone wants to share, they should be able to. Putting the 'REALLY YOU SHOULD UPGRADE' sticker on there as well is perfectly alright in my book. | |
| Sep 17, 2014 at 14:17 | history | answered | Mateo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |