Timeline for Is it "not done" to (drastically) change an answer that is already accepted or upvoted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2014 at 7:36 | vote | accept | Jacob Vlijm | ||
| Aug 14, 2014 at 20:20 | answer | added | Robert Cartaino | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 14, 2014 at 16:00 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | This is often okay, at least when it doesn't involving removing a significant portion of the answer that people may have found useful. But I think it's necessary to look at each individual instance to decide. If you have a particular answer you're thinking of editing, I recommend editing this meta question to include a link to it (as well as details about how you're thinking of editing it and whatever thoughts you've had so far about the pros and cons of doing so). | |
| Aug 14, 2014 at 15:32 | history | asked | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |