Timeline for How to know which questions should be closed, a reprise
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2017 at 20:53 | history | edited | Fabby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed minor spelling and/or grammar issues.
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 8:13 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2014 at 7:55 | history | rollback | OliMod |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| Aug 12, 2014 at 2:25 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
don't bring noise to the post which actually distracts, if you have any problem with anyone asking for second opionions ask directly to that person
|
| Aug 11, 2014 at 19:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/498912277719175169 | ||
| Aug 10, 2014 at 17:24 | answer | added | don.joey | timeline score: -3 | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 17:57 | comment | added | Oli Mod | New duplicates are the exception. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 17:55 | comment | added | bain | If answering questions is more important than closing them, and there is a constant stream of unanswered questions (~4000 a month), then the implication is that nobody should be reviewing the close queue when they could instead be answering questions. Which means that nobody should ever review the close queue. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 17:37 | comment | added | Oli Mod | So that's saying they're just sorted by how they're reviewed. First by number of reviews, descending and then by time added to review, ascending. The age of the question doesn't appear to factor into things but I agree that wouldn't be a bad first step. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 17:02 | comment | added | Braiam | @bain meta.stackexchange.com/a/199912/213575 | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 16:58 | comment | added | bain | I had always assumed that the close queue was sorted by date, so that more recent questions get priority. Is that actually the case? If not, perhaps it should be - it would be a very simple way to achieve prioritisation of new questions over old. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 16:51 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 11:29 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 74 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2014 at 11:17 | answer | added | bain | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 7:08 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2014 at 6:37 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 402 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2014 at 22:46 | history | asked | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |