Skip to main content
Syborgia Alphas's user avatar
Syborgia Alphas's user avatar
Syborgia Alphas's user avatar
Syborgia Alphas
  • Member for 14 years
  • Last seen more than 10 years ago
awarded
awarded
comment
comment
Is it "not done" to (drastically) change an answer that is already accepted or upvoted?
In science, errors are not deleted, just noted in a comment. This is done for reasons of error tracing (find the source of possible errors).
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
comment
What to do if the good answer is in another question?
It's only useless to you. Others my find it useful. First, if I find links to other issues with similar answers. I can determine if something is a bug or a settings issue. Next, Resolutions on one system may differ slightly on another. I usually look for multiple resolutions. I come here initially, for an overview - but don't find enough information, so I go to youtube, where I can see multiple solutions - without interference from a mod.
revised
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
comment
Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?
"Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?" The issues I've posed are on topic! They are in regards to circumstances that need to be considered - in the "should we" part of the question. I have no interest in being a moderator. However, my opinion was asked, when this question popped up -- so this is my ---OPINION--- . If you don't like it then -- fine.
comment
Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?
When tracing a bug; a bug may be specific to Ubuntu. However, it also may be a larger Debian issue (Ubuntu is a Debian branch of Linux). This situation, is by definition "off-topic" but useful to the community in locating and resolving issues. If these groups are not for debug and community support (which does in certain cases result in "off-topic" questions). Then this should be clearly stated.
comment
Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?
Further, since links and tags can be used to link issues together, migration paths become a mute point. Remember, not everyone in this community is an expert. We come here for community support! Not administrative abuse!
comment
Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?
I was speaking generally, migration whether in part (single topic) or in whole defeats the purpose of community based support. Individual communities (like AskUbuntu and U&L) have individual interests (and concerns) and mutual interests. With this in mind determining what's "Off Topic" is highly subjective.
comment
Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?
However - (just a thought) - the two communities can be linked, by the user via link to questions in either AskUbuntu or U&L I've done this on the FFMPEG issue casting a wider net, trying to determine whether an FFMPEG issue is a Ubuntu specific issue or a larger Linux/bug issue.
comment
Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?
AskUbuntu is needed to deal with the differences between Ubuntu and standard Linux. Removing, or merging, into U&L (which serves Unix & Linux - generally) would be a disservice to those trying to resolve issues specific to Ubuntu, and not Linux in general.