Like I said, "If you no longer have a vested interest in the question and it hasn't been reasonably answered (or you can no longer provide requested details)" It appears that question has been sufficiently answered. There's really no need to transfer ownership to someone else. If the answer doesn't work for someone new they can open a new question, citing your original question as their starting point, and the conversation can move forward from there.

Ha! I know how you feel, it can be frustrating at time for sure.

Please don't do it all the time.

It's bad community practice, not only does it make more work for moderators it makes it more inconvenient for users who are new to the site. You are all here as editors and maintainers of the site, the reputation really shouldn't be your primary goal

There, now you can :)

In short, no. This isn't needed which is why it doesn't exist.

@James It does make it a low quality edit. Don't just focus on one aspect of a question when you can fix many. Edits that are too minor, which we've taken to mean it only fixes one small aspect of another wise "troubled" question, are no good in our eyes. If you're going to take the time to edit (and bump the question) please edit the entire question to make it of higher quality. Titles are just one small portion of the quality game at Ask Ubuntu.

Just went though and did a bit of...cleanup. Cheers!

Unless you delete a bunch of questions, I think you'll be OKay, but it's up to you.