That sounds nice, but it doesn't really work in practice. While AI models sometimes do produce a correct answer, they often produce answers that sound right but are totally wrong, and most reviewers can't easily verify answers to ensure they are correct. Also, some users post tons of AI-generated answers which is annoying and problematic

@Marijn I agree, and have edited my answer accordingly

I agree personally, but some people do care about the home page being clean. That said, I've briefly written up an answer outlining a potential path forward. It would require status-review, but I wonder if SE would be willing to do this under the community bot account. That would also have the effect of helping other sites too (OTOH, if not, I don't mind sharing the hypothetical script I could write). That also wouldn't bump posts, which would be nice

@Nmath Here is a link to a list of other Meta posts about this, some of which may have suggestions. Glorfindel also wrote a script to help with auto-uploading to i.stack.imgur.com. But, this is enough posts that mass-editing would totally flood the Home page. One possible idea is for SE to handle it like the CommonMark migration (where SE had Community◆ automatically edit all the posts, so that the revisions would be logged but the posts wouldn't get bumped. Also, status-review might help

@Rishon_JR Ehh… sometimes I need to add additional context in a flag when informing the mods about a user using ChatGPT, so being able to add some more info as text would be handy for a ChatGPT flag

@muru I noticed that you are removing the python-wheel tag. I don’t mind that you’re removing it (it seemed reasonable to add it IMO, but I don’t feel strongly about it), but once you’re done, would you mind editing this Meta answer to reflex that said tag is gone?