7
have the right to know if I'm being reviewed
Maybe... I mean, we're all being monitored in the sense that everything we do here is seen by other users. On top of that, the lowest rep users have most of their posts fed into review queues, you will have your edits scrutinised before being approved until you hit 2k rep. And anybody can flag something of yours ...
5
According to https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/158678/280883
Here are the full details on how the ban works. Most of the steps take into account the length of any previous review bans you've faced, including manual bans imposed by a moderator:
If you fail three audits within a (rolling) 30-day period, you will be banned for 2 days if you have no ...
5
This post from 2017 suggests the vote does not get registered on the real post. If you want your vote to stick, you have to go through to the real post and vote.
I (correctly) upvoted it as a reasonable post and passed the review audit; however, when I looked at it later, my upvote hadn't actually been applied. (I was able to manually upvote it later).
I'm ...
4
Those comments are only generated in the Low Quality Posts review queue, and automatically (you can choose from a list of half a dozen standard comments, or choose to leave no comment at all). You get access to that queue at 2,000 reputation.
I agree that these comments can be useful from the First Posts (or Late Answers) queue as well; that's why I use the ...
3
Nothing you do in a review audit is real. I think of review audits as mock-ups based on real posts. The post score will be shown differently from the real score, the author's picture and reputation may be fake, and the post itself may already have been deleted. We cannot interact with this mirage. Follow the link to the real post to upvote for real.
Shog9 ...
2
I COMPLETELY concur with @Zanna with the advice in the question. I have made the same categorical plea to specific users who have committed the same pattern of "reviewership" in the community where I moderate.
When I did, I am careful not to come across as scornful, but with an advisory tone. Of course, everyone is free to review however they feel is ...
2
That particular comment is automatically generated by the system through the Low Quality Posts review queue. I'm not sure if there is a list of these (so you can copy them) but you can see all options here:
Nowadays, the comments have some links in them, but the text hasn't changed significantly over the years.
Other interesting links:
Repository of ...
2
Review audits are frequently intentionally tricky and weird. It's a common practice on the Stack Exchange network designed to teach the reviewer to stop, look and listen. It's not unusual at Stack Overflow to find audit questions in the close vote review that have an accepted self-answer posted by the author of the question. My first instinct would be to ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
