Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with flagging
Search options not deleted
user 480481
14
votes
Accepted
You are currently banned from flagging - view flags declined in the last 7 days
As Thomas Ward puts it
We are a bit harsh when it comes to the use of the VLQ flag. We reserve the VLQ flag for totally, completely, unsalvageable crap, not for unclear questions.
[...]
VLQ has some …
- 69.8k
7
votes
Accepted
Duplicate vs Linked vs Related. Best practice for site navigation
If you do not want to close the question as a duplicate, then do not use the duplicate flag. Simply leave a comment with the link to the related question instead, then it would appear under the 'Linke …
- 69.8k
3
votes
2
answers
92
views
What happened to "blatantly off-topic"?
If I remember correctly there was a "blatantly off-topic" option in Flagging > Closing > Off-topic (while flagging a question). … Should we also refrain from using a custom reason/comment like "blatantly off-topic" while close-voting (or flagging for closure) a supposedly off-topic question as I did here? …
- 69.8k