Search Results

A query like the following should work: [graphics] [drivers] answers:1 (I get about 500+ results.) For more search options, check out the help page on searching.

According to the list of top users for schedule, you are capable of suggesting a synonym for it, and there are more than five other users with a score of 5. The top user is Mitch♦, and I guess his vot …

Personally, I remove those tags if the question's answers now cover multiple versions of Ubuntu, and people have shown an inclination to add answers for versions yet-to-be-covered. … If any of those is true, nuke the tags. The tags only make sense when the a solution must work for that tag - and if that's been handled, there's not much use for it. …

As for changing all tags to computer, we have some pretty ridiculous tag synonmizing: Please undo tag synonymizing: gnome-shell -> gnome, so don't rule it out. …

This tag is no longer locally available.

The local tag has no usage guidance and it has been applied to questions without any consistent sense (from package management to networking, wherever people think some meaning of the word "local" can …

Other sites I frequent have a tag related to history (not your command history): Unix & Linux: history Vi and Vim: history-of Science Fiction and Fantasy: history-of And others: English Language …

Every now and then, somebody will go and type parts of some error they're seeing into the tag box, and if the have more than 300 reputation, the tag system will gladly create tags out of each individual …

I think the sane solution is the one adopted by Meta Stack Overflow: use a scope tag, of which offtopic-questions and on-topic are synonyms.

I propose that we merge shell-scripts as well. shell-scripts by itself is not much more specific than the others. Most, if not all, scripts contain some amount of code run by another language: Awk, Pe …

Tags are for classifying questions, and thereby allowing people who are interested in a particular topic focus on that topic. … If a tag is too broad, people will pick narrower tags. No one is interested in the xfce-desktop package ... because there is no such package. …

Just saw that there's tag for safety, with no usage guidance, and questions mostly about how "safe" something is. Seems like it should be a synonym of security. Or nuked altogether.

Why should every component of the same software get tags? Even if it does need a tag, looking at GNOME Shell's design docs, it's not even at the same level as say, the top-bar. …

I'd like to suggest that the top-bar tag be done away with. I propose the following criteria: if the "thing" can be used by itself, or customised by itself, it might make sense to refer to it with t …

I feel this is similar to the bug or error tags, both of which were blacklisted: http://meta.askubuntu.com/q/5888/158442 http://meta.askubuntu.com/q/3386/158442 On a related note, we have a frozen …