Apparently, I've been banned from flagging after I flagged these two non-answers + one answer:

- [This one](https://askubuntu.com/a/804425/271) talking entirely about Android Studio, while the question was about how to run the Android AVD Manager (different software) and Android Studio was only briefly mentioned by the OP in a previews review of the question

- [This one](https://askubuntu.com/a/547274/271) whose meaning basically reduces to *Please run `free` and post the output* which is clearly a "request for clarification" as mentioned in the standard not-an-answer comment, plus other "some patches not solutions" (citing the author **literally**)

- A third one which was admittedly an oversight of mine

I already checked [How long will I be flag banned for?][1] which I think answers one of my concerns (assuming that this duration is the same for every user), however I still have some doubts:

- **How many** declined flags are required to trigger such a ban? Here I see 1 flag declined for a good reason and 2 which are honestly quite disputable
- Seriously, why was the first one declined? I can see how some people might decline a flag on a very low quality answer like the second one, but the first does *not* answer the question

  [1]: https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/14581/how-long-will-i-be-flag-banned-for