You’re free to use whatever numbering scheme you want as long as it gives the correct output. There is no preferred way that I know of, and this is good – needlessly limiting people’s ability to produce the desired output serves no purpose and can even be harmful: Too many rules alienate users from writing posts, and that’s definitely not what we want.
As the output shows, there is absolutely no difference between a list numbered with any 0 or 1
0.
0.
0.
and a list using the actual numbers that appear in the output as well:
1.
2.
3.
The first number you use is the starting number for the list (but both 0
and 1
give 1), so to begin with 4 you could do 4., 5., 6.
or 4., 4., 4.
or even 4., 0., 10.
, the output is the same. In the case of your answer the editor just wasn’t fully aware your syntax was fine.
Ask Ubuntu’s formatting help page is a single page with everything you need to know about markdown by design; let’s keep it as simple as possible. It says:
A numbered list:
1. Numbered lists are easy 2. Markdown keeps track of the numbers for you 7. So this will be item 3.
I’d say this means essentially what I wrote above: Output matters, the rest is up to you.