Why do we need a grub-error tag?

It will not fit both and at the same time and its a useless tag to follow.

Normally if someone is good at solving and issues he will also know how to solve errors on those tags.

We don't have a unity-error tag, we have , we dont have wireless-error, we have .

Why ? Should we kill it?

  • Can grub be the master synonym please? I don't think it was intended for grub2 to the master..
    – jokerdino Mod
    Commented Jun 11, 2012 at 6:30

2 Answers 2


Yup. You might as well merge into at the same time. If people need to specify Grub v1, they can do that.

  • I can remember the discussion on chat and I was against a merge at that point. I have changed my mind meanwhile because it just makes sense. Commented Feb 16, 2012 at 16:22
  • it's sounds very logical... it's pointless to have grub, grub2 and grub-error.
    – maniat1k
    Commented Feb 17, 2012 at 22:41

Things to consider when discussing this:

  • is generally a more serious error - however, while that needs to be taken into consideration, its not really a stopping problem.

  • Currently, for the moment I have it as a synonym of grub. However, because I didn't merge the tags, we can easily change that to whatever we want, if we need to.

  • Rename grub2 to grub please.
    – jokerdino Mod
    Commented Jun 11, 2012 at 6:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .